Author Question: Within-subjects designs are good for: a. equating groups b. reducing error variance c. ... (Read 118 times)

NClaborn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
Within-subjects designs are good for:
 
  a. equating groups
  b. reducing error variance
  c. increasing the sensitivity of a study
  d. all of these

Question 2

Which of the following methods will create groups that are the most equivalent at the start of an experiment?
 
  a. random assignment
  b. matching
  c. within-subjects design
  d. counterbalancing



randomguy133

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

More than 50% of American adults have oral herpes, which is commonly known as "cold sores" or "fever blisters." The herpes virus can be active on the skin surface without showing any signs or causing any symptoms.

Did you know?

Approximately 25% of all reported medication errors result from some kind of name confusion.

Did you know?

Side effects from substance abuse include nausea, dehydration, reduced productivitiy, and dependence. Though these effects usually worsen over time, the constant need for the substance often overcomes rational thinking.

Did you know?

The term pharmacology is derived from the Greek words pharmakon("claim, medicine, poison, or remedy") and logos ("study").

Did you know?

Historic treatments for rheumatoid arthritis have included gold salts, acupuncture, a diet consisting of apples or rhubarb, nutmeg, nettles, bee venom, bracelets made of copper, prayer, rest, tooth extractions, fasting, honey, vitamins, insulin, snow collected on Christmas, magnets, and electric convulsion therapy.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library