Within-subjects designs are good for: a. equating groups b. reducing error variance c. ...

Author Question: Within-subjects designs are good for: a. equating groups b. reducing error variance c. ... (Read 112 times)

NClaborn

Hero Member
Posts: 560

on: Jun 20, 2018

Within-subjects designs are good for:

a. equating groups
b. reducing error variance
c. increasing the sensitivity of a study
d. all of these

Question 2

Which of the following methods will create groups that are the most equivalent at the start of an experiment?

a. random assignment
b. matching
c. within-subjects design
d. counterbalancing

randomguy133

Sr. Member
Posts: 310

Reply #1 on: Jun 20, 2018

Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

C

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

« previous next »

Did you know?

Egg cells are about the size of a grain of sand. They are formed inside of a female's ovaries before she is even born.

Did you know?

Pink eye is a term that refers to conjunctivitis, which is inflammation of the thin, clear membrane (conjunctiva) over the white part of the eye (sclera). It may be triggered by a virus, bacteria, or foreign body in the eye. Antibiotic eye drops alleviate bacterial conjunctivitis, and antihistamine allergy pills or eye drops help control allergic conjunctivitis symptoms.

Did you know?

This year, an estimated 1.4 million Americans will have a new or recurrent heart attack.

Did you know?

Recent studies have shown that the number of medication errors increases in relation to the number of orders that are verified per pharmacist, per work shift.

Did you know?

Disorders that may affect pharmacodynamics include genetic mutations, malnutrition, thyrotoxicosis, myasthenia gravis, Parkinson's disease, and certain forms of insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus.