Answer to Question 1
Correct Answer: 1
Rationale 1: A client who is confused, disoriented, or sedated is not considered functionally competent and a legal guardian or representative can provide or refuse consent for the client. In this case, because the client was given medication that sedated him, the wife would be appropriate for giving consent for the surgical procedure.
Rationale 2: Waiting until the effects of the medication wear off would not be in the best interest of the client.
Rationale 3: Thorough explanation may or may not matter in this case because the client is considered functionally incompetent. Besides, it is the physician's responsibility to obtain informed consent.
Rationale 4: Implied consent may be used in a medical emergency, but in this case, there is an appropriate option available.
Answer to Question 2
Correct Answer: 4
Rationale 1: If the client has questions, he should not sign the form. These questions require the physician's attention before the consent is signed.
Rationale 2: If the client has questions, he should not sign the form, and it is not the nurse's responsibility to answer the questions.
Rationale 3: Telling the client what he should have done is demeaning and not an appropriate therapeutic response.
Rationale 4: Obtaining informed consent for specific medical treatment is the responsibility of the person who is going to perform the procedure, in this case the physician. Informed consent suggests that the client has been given complete information, including benefits, risks, and alternatives if the treatment is not given. An element of informed consent is that the client must be given enough information to be the ultimate decision maker. If not, it is the physician's responsibility to make sure the client's understanding is clear. It is important that the person obtaining the consent (the physician in this case) answer the client's questions.