T he Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004:
a. r equires school districts to determine eligibility for special education services within six months after parent permission for an evaluation is received.
b. s tates that a reevaluation must occur at least once every two years, unless the school and parent agree that a reevaluation is not necessary.
c. h olds school districts responsible for providing a free and appropriate public education for students even if a parent refuses to give consent for special education services.
d. r equires all students take part in all state- and district-wide assessments with accommodations or alternative assessments if necessary, as stipulated in the students IEP.
Question 2
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004:
a. significantly affects students, but has little effect on the professional lives of general and special education teachers.
b. has not affected state- and district-wide assessment policies for children with disabilities.
c. resulted in changes to the IEP, such as short-term objectives and benchmarks no longer being required, except for students who are evaluated by means of alternative assessments.
d. continues to require new IEPs to be developed every year for every student who receives special education services.
Patient education
A Schematic Description of the Experiment by Maviel et al. (2004)
The main avenue to the upward social mobility reviewed in the text has been higher education.
Parents who have higher levels of education encourage their children to be educated
A pedigree for a rare autosomal recessive trait. In these pedigrees, most affected individuals have
individuals with xeroderma pigmentosum