A defendant might be held responsible in strict liability for damages caused by blasting because
A) the defendant acted with utmost care possible
B) this is an abnormally dangerous activity
C) the social utility outweighs the risk
D) society could not function if blasting was made illegal
Question 2
Which defense could allow defendant to escape responsibility for a claim in strict liability?
A) comparative fault
B) a statute saying that the defendant should not be strictly liable
C) contributory negligence
D) assumption of the risk
This patient presented with a case of facial palsy caused by an infection by the bacterial ...
Chronic disease is caused by a mixture of genetic and environmental influences
The Fukushima disaster in Japan caused many governments to rethink their commitment to nuclear power
Industry is responsible for 21% of global greenhouse gas emissions
The Food Label Provides Valuable Consumer Information Manufacturers must adhere to strict labeling
After elections were held, it was desired to estimate the proportion of voters who regretted ...