A defendant might be held responsible in strict liability for damages caused by blasting because
A) the defendant acted with utmost care possible
B) this is an abnormally dangerous activity
C) the social utility outweighs the risk
D) society could not function if blasting was made illegal
Question 2
Which defense could allow defendant to escape responsibility for a claim in strict liability?
A) comparative fault
B) a statute saying that the defendant should not be strictly liable
C) contributory negligence
D) assumption of the risk
Variegated leaves caused by a mutation in cpDNA
Severe hash is almost always caused by cylinder misfire conditions.
Notice the reddish-brown haze caused by nitrogen oxides that is often over many major cities.
Mount Pinatubo caused ~1˚C cooling for up to 5 years
The Food Label Provides Valuable Consumer Information Manufacturers must adhere to strict labeling