This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Evidence is mounting that obese individuals with ____ fat are clearly at higher risk for heart ... (Read 72 times)

Metfan725

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Evidence is mounting that obese individuals with ____ fat are clearly at higher risk for heart disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes.
 a. retroperitoneal
  b. abdominal
 c. subcutaneous
 d. nonessential
 e. lateral

Question 2

A waist circumference ____ indicates a higher risk for cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes.
 a. above 40 inches in men and 35 inches in women
 b. above 35 inches in men and 40 inches in women
  c. below 35 inches in men and 32 inches in women
  d. below 32 inches in men and 35 inches in women
  e. below 40 inches in men and 30 inches in women



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

bigcheese9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 333
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

a



Metfan725

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Both answers were spot on, thank you once again




 

Did you know?

Side effects from substance abuse include nausea, dehydration, reduced productivitiy, and dependence. Though these effects usually worsen over time, the constant need for the substance often overcomes rational thinking.

Did you know?

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that all women age 65 years of age or older should be screened with bone densitometry.

Did you know?

Critical care patients are twice as likely to receive the wrong medication. Of these errors, 20% are life-threatening, and 42% require additional life-sustaining treatments.

Did you know?

When intravenous medications are involved in adverse drug events, their harmful effects may occur more rapidly, and be more severe than errors with oral medications. This is due to the direct administration into the bloodstream.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library