This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Advertising equivalency may is not always a reliable measurement tool because A) management ... (Read 9 times)

SO00

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Advertising equivalency may is not always a reliable measurement tool because
 
  A) management limits available advertising dollars.
  B) Publicity and advertising are very different things.
  C) News stories carry greater credibility than advertisements.
  D) Both B and C.
  E) none of the above

Question 2

Advertising equivalency as a means to measure the value of publicity is controversial
 
  Indicate whether this statement is true or false.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

jackie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
Answer to Question 1

Answer: D

Answer to Question 2

TRUE




SO00

  • Member
  • Posts: 568
Reply 2 on: Aug 11, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


shewald78

  • Member
  • Posts: 340
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

A seasonal flu vaccine is the best way to reduce the chances you will get seasonal influenza and spread it to others.

Did you know?

The first-known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used in Egypt in 2000 BC. Condoms were also reportedly used, made of animal bladders or intestines.

Did you know?

Earwax has antimicrobial properties that reduce the viability of bacteria and fungus in the human ear.

Did you know?

The highest suicide rate in the United States is among people ages 65 years and older. Almost 15% of people in this age group commit suicide every year.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library