This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Discuss how the Supreme Court decisions in the Kent v. United States and the Breed v. Jones cases ... (Read 43 times)

joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
Discuss how the Supreme Court decisions in the Kent v. United States and the Breed v. Jones cases impacted the waiver process. Be sure to address the significance of each case.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

The two primary functions of appeals are error correction and policy formation.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Chocorrol77

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
Answer to Question 1

Kent v. United States
The Court, in a far-reaching opinion, agreed that Gerald Gault's constitutional rights had been violated. Notice of charges was an essential ingredient of due process of law, as was the right to counsel, the right to cross-examine and to confront witnesses, and the privilege against self-incrimination.

Significance of the Case
The Gault case established that a child has the due process constitutional rights listed here in delinquency adjudication proceedings, where the consequences were that the child could be committed to a state institution.

Furthermore, in an appendix to its opinion, the Court set up criteria concerning waiver of the jurisdictions. These are:
 The seriousness of the alleged offense to the community
 Whether the alleged offense was committed in an aggressive, violent, or willful manner
 Whether the alleged offense was committed against persons or against property
 The merit of the complaint
 The sophistication and maturity of the juvenile
 The record and previous history of the juvenile
 Prospects for adequate protection of the public and the likelihood of reasonable rehabilitation
Breed v. Jones
The U.S. Supreme Court held that the prosecution of Jones as an adult in the California Superior Court, after an adjudicatory finding in the juvenile court that he had violated a criminal statute and a subsequent finding that he was unfit for treatment as a juvenile, violated the double-jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

Significance of the Case
The Breed case provided answers on several important transfer issues: (a) it prohibits trying a child in an adult court when there has been a prior adjudicatory juvenile proceeding; (b) probable cause may exist at a transfer hearing, and this does not violate subsequent jeopardy if the child is transferred to the adult court; (c) because the same evidence is often used in both the transfer hearing and subsequent trial in either the juvenile or adult court, a different judge is often required for each hearing.

Answer to Question 2

T





 

Did you know?

Elderly adults are living longer, and causes of death are shifting. At the same time, autopsy rates are at or near their lowest in history.

Did you know?

In 1886, William Bates reported on the discovery of a substance produced by the adrenal gland that turned out to be epinephrine (adrenaline). In 1904, this drug was first artificially synthesized by Friedrich Stolz.

Did you know?

To maintain good kidney function, you should drink at least 3 quarts of water daily. Water dilutes urine and helps prevent concentrations of salts and minerals that can lead to kidney stone formation. Chronic dehydration is a major contributor to the development of kidney stones.

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

When blood is deoxygenated and flowing back to the heart through the veins, it is dark reddish-blue in color. Blood in the arteries that is oxygenated and flowing out to the body is bright red. Whereas arterial blood comes out in spurts, venous blood flows.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library