This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Discuss how the Supreme Court decisions in the Kent v. United States and the Breed v. Jones cases ... (Read 44 times)

joe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 627
Discuss how the Supreme Court decisions in the Kent v. United States and the Breed v. Jones cases impacted the waiver process. Be sure to address the significance of each case.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

The two primary functions of appeals are error correction and policy formation.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Chocorrol77

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
Answer to Question 1

Kent v. United States
The Court, in a far-reaching opinion, agreed that Gerald Gault's constitutional rights had been violated. Notice of charges was an essential ingredient of due process of law, as was the right to counsel, the right to cross-examine and to confront witnesses, and the privilege against self-incrimination.

Significance of the Case
The Gault case established that a child has the due process constitutional rights listed here in delinquency adjudication proceedings, where the consequences were that the child could be committed to a state institution.

Furthermore, in an appendix to its opinion, the Court set up criteria concerning waiver of the jurisdictions. These are:
 The seriousness of the alleged offense to the community
 Whether the alleged offense was committed in an aggressive, violent, or willful manner
 Whether the alleged offense was committed against persons or against property
 The merit of the complaint
 The sophistication and maturity of the juvenile
 The record and previous history of the juvenile
 Prospects for adequate protection of the public and the likelihood of reasonable rehabilitation
Breed v. Jones
The U.S. Supreme Court held that the prosecution of Jones as an adult in the California Superior Court, after an adjudicatory finding in the juvenile court that he had violated a criminal statute and a subsequent finding that he was unfit for treatment as a juvenile, violated the double-jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

Significance of the Case
The Breed case provided answers on several important transfer issues: (a) it prohibits trying a child in an adult court when there has been a prior adjudicatory juvenile proceeding; (b) probable cause may exist at a transfer hearing, and this does not violate subsequent jeopardy if the child is transferred to the adult court; (c) because the same evidence is often used in both the transfer hearing and subsequent trial in either the juvenile or adult court, a different judge is often required for each hearing.

Answer to Question 2

T





 

Did you know?

Patients who cannot swallow may receive nutrition via a parenteral route—usually, a catheter is inserted through the chest into a large vein going into the heart.

Did you know?

The liver is the only organ that has the ability to regenerate itself after certain types of damage. As much as 25% of the liver can be removed, and it will still regenerate back to its original shape and size. However, the liver cannot regenerate after severe damage caused by alcohol.

Did you know?

Elderly adults are living longer, and causes of death are shifting. At the same time, autopsy rates are at or near their lowest in history.

Did you know?

Prostaglandins were first isolated from human semen in Sweden in the 1930s. They were so named because the researcher thought that they came from the prostate gland. In fact, prostaglandins exist and are synthesized in almost every cell of the body.

Did you know?

Calcitonin is a naturally occurring hormone. In women who are at least 5 years beyond menopause, it slows bone loss and increases spinal bone density.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library