Author Question: In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop that ... (Read 84 times)

saliriagwu · **on:** Aug 16, 2018

In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop that reveals no information other than the location of an illegal substance that no individual has any right to possess does not violate the:

a. Fourth Amendment.
b. Fifth Amendment.
c. Sixth Amendment.
d. Eighth Amendment.

Question 2

A custodial search may be deemed incident to arrest even when carried out later than the time of arrest, if there was a:

a. reason for the delay.
b. valid reason for the delay.
c. delay.
d. None of the answers are correct.

jrpg123456 · **Reply #1 on:** Aug 16, 2018

Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

b

saliriagwu · **Reply #2 on:** Aug 16, 2018

Thank you!

jrpg123456 · **Reply #3 on:** Aug 16, 2018

Always glad to help...

Author Question: In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop that ... (Read 84 times)

saliriagwu

In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop that ...

Related Topics

Need homework help now?

jrpg123456

In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop that ...

saliriagwu

In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop that ...

jrpg123456

In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a dog sniff conducted during a lawful traffic stop that ...