This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Manson v. Braithwaite (1977), for determining the admissibility of witness identification, the ... (Read 53 times)

big1devin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 583
In Manson v. Braithwaite (1977), for determining the admissibility of witness identification, the majority of the Supreme Court endorsed what became known as the:
 
  a. per se approach.
  b. blind administration test.
  c. the totality of the circumstances approach.
  d. the better use approach.

Question 2

Which of the following is NOT one of the five factors in the totality of circumstances that should weigh heavily in determining whether the lineup or show-up procedure created a likelihood of misidentification?
 
  a. Witness level of certainty when identifying the suspects during the ID procedure.
  b. Witness degree of attention at the time of the crime.
  c. Witness age at the time of the crime.
  d. Witness opportunity to observe.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

SAUXC

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

c

Answer to Question 2

c




big1devin

  • Member
  • Posts: 583
Reply 2 on: Aug 16, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


EAN94

  • Member
  • Posts: 307
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

The word drug comes from the Dutch word droog (meaning "dry"). For centuries, most drugs came from dried plants, hence the name.

Did you know?

The largest baby ever born weighed more than 23 pounds but died just 11 hours after his birth in 1879. The largest surviving baby was born in October 2009 in Sumatra, Indonesia, and weighed an astounding 19.2 pounds at birth.

Did you know?

Between 1999 and 2012, American adults with high total cholesterol decreased from 18.3% to 12.9%

Did you know?

Warfarin was developed as a consequence of the study of a strange bleeding disorder that suddenly occurred in cattle on the northern prairies of the United States in the early 1900s.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library