In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, the Supreme Court ruled that ...

[roselinechinyere27m]

In Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, the Supreme Court ruled that an analyst's laboratory report prepared for the prosecution was:
 
  a. admissible based on a well-established hearsay exception.
  b. testimonial, so the defendant should have been allowed to cross-examine the analyst.
  c. admissible because scientific reports are reliable.
  d. testimonial unless a testable sample of the material on which the report is based is made available to the defendant.

Question 2

Which of the following can be considered a separate sovereign for double jeopardy purposes?
 
  a. Cities
  b. Counties
  c. States
  d. Different state appellate court districts

[tandmlomax84]

Answer to Question 1

Answer: b

Answer to Question 2

Answer: c

[roselinechinyere27m]

Thanks

[tandmlomax84]

Welcome