Author Question: The rule that a car passenger cannot challenge the constitutionality of evidence seized from the car ... (Read 57 times)

Pineappleeh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 585
The rule that a car passenger cannot challenge the constitutionality of evidence seized from the car without standing to show a connection to the evidence is an example of the expectation of privacy doctrine created by Katz v. United States.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Which of the following is NOT considered an objective in ensuring probative information is
  recovered?
 
  A) To search for any and all malware that may have infected the system
  B) To recover deleted, existing, hidden, and password protected files
  C) To protect the computer system during the actual investigation
  D) To determine if steganography was used



whitcassie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Answer to Question 1

FALSE Rakas v. Illinois (1978 )

Answer to Question 2

A



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

As many as 20% of Americans have been infected by the fungus known as Histoplasmosis. While most people are asymptomatic or only have slight symptoms, infection can progress to a rapid and potentially fatal superinfection.

Did you know?

Many of the drugs used by neuroscientists are derived from toxic plants and venomous animals (such as snakes, spiders, snails, and puffer fish).

Did you know?

For pediatric patients, intravenous fluids are the most commonly cited products involved in medication errors that are reported to the USP.

Did you know?

The modern decimal position system was the invention of the Hindus (around 800 AD), involving the placing of numerals to indicate their value (units, tens, hundreds, and so on).

Did you know?

People with high total cholesterol have about two times the risk for heart disease as people with ideal levels.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library