This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following could best be represented by a physical model? A) a cell B) an atom C) ... (Read 379 times)

sarasara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 521
Which of the following could best be represented by a physical model?
 
  A) a cell
  B) an atom
  C) rationality
  D) ecosystem
  E) both A and B

Question 2

How is your macroscopic drawing related to what is occurring on the sub-microscopic (particulate) level? What evidence do you have to defend your statement?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

janeli

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

On the sub-microscopic level, the particles that make up the Kool-aid are coming off of the bigger chunk as the chunk fall through the water. The evidence of this is that the chunk is getting smaller and the water is taking on the color of the Kool-aid. Though we can't see the individual particles of Kool-aid, their presence is indicated by the coloring of the water. There must be incredibly tiny Kool-aid particles intermingled with the particles of water.




sarasara

  • Member
  • Posts: 521
Reply 2 on: Aug 27, 2018
:D TYSM


tkempin

  • Member
  • Posts: 332
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

There are over 65,000 known species of protozoa. About 10,000 species are parasitic.

Did you know?

Malaria mortality rates are falling. Increased malaria prevention and control measures have greatly improved these rates. Since 2000, malaria mortality rates have fallen globally by 60% among all age groups, and by 65% among children under age 5.

Did you know?

Blood is approximately twice as thick as water because of the cells and other components found in it.

Did you know?

This year, an estimated 1.4 million Americans will have a new or recurrent heart attack.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library