[Answered] For liberals, any explanation of the prevalence of war in human history starts with international ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: For liberals, any explanation of the prevalence of war in human history starts with international ... (Read 64 times)

bclement10

Hero Member
Posts: 560

on: Sep 4, 2018

For liberals, any explanation of the prevalence of war in human history starts with international anarchy

Indicate whether this statement is true or false.

Question 2

Different paradigms can explain the world, but they do not provide us policy prescriptions

Indicate whether this statement is true or false

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

todom5090

Sr. Member
Posts: 328

Reply #1 on: Sep 4, 2018

Answer to Question 1

F

Answer to Question 2

FALSE

bclement10

Member
Posts: 560

Reply 2 on: Sep 4, 2018

TYSM

nothere

Member
Posts: 324

Reply 3 on: Yesterday

YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

« previous next »

Did you know?

The use of salicylates dates back 2,500 years to Hippocrates's recommendation of willow bark (from which a salicylate is derived) as an aid to the pains of childbirth. However, overdosage of salicylates can harm body fluids, electrolytes, the CNS, the GI tract, the ears, the lungs, the blood, the liver, and the kidneys and cause coma or death.

Did you know?

Eat fiber! A diet high in fiber can help lower cholesterol levels by as much as 10%.

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

In the ancient and medieval periods, dysentery killed about ? of all babies before they reach 12 months of age. The disease was transferred through contaminated drinking water, because there was no way to adequately dispose of sewage, which contaminated the water.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.