Mrs. Sharp, the owner of a restaurant, induced the Morissons to buy the business by a misrepresentation; the invoices made her costs appear less than they actually were, and thus her profits more than they actually were. On these facts, which of the following is false?
◦ The cause of action could be for the tort of deceit, if there was evidence that Mrs. Sharp intended to deceive the Morissons.
◦ The court could not award the equitable remedy of rectification because the argument is not about rectifying an erroneous written version of a previous oral contract.
◦ The court could award the equitable remedy of rescission if the evidence showed she had fraudulently misrepresented the costs.
◦ The court could not award the equitable remedy of rescission if evidence showed that Mrs. Sharp really believed the invoices were accurate.
◦ The court could terminate the contract for breach of contract if the accurate statement of costs and profit were essential terms of the contract.
Time-course of reprogramming mouse fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells
The Weather Business: A Brief Overview
Business Math
Business Math
Business Mathematics in Canada, 11e (Jerome, Worswick)
Business Mathematics, 15th Edition