Gordon invented a solution that dissolved the residue of tape that remained on walls after the removal of notices, pictures, etc. He kept his formula secret, but wasn't yet interested in marketing it, just in improving it. Gordon's only employee, Thad, who had signed a contract to work until July 1, 2011, was offered a job by Mr. Barr, who would pay him twice his salary if Thad would leave Gordon right away (in April) and bring Gordon's secret formula with him. Because Thad was upset by Gordon's lack of interest in marketing his product, he did copy the formula, quit, and began working for Barr, who marketed the solution. On these facts, which of the following is false?
◦ Gordon could sue Thad for breach of the employment contract.
◦ Gordon could not get an injunction to stop Barr from marketing the product because Barr didn't steal the formula.
◦ Gordon could sue Thad for breach of trade secret law.
◦ Gordon could sue Barr for inducing breach of contract.
◦ As one remedy, Gordon could ask for the accounting of profits.
Benedict's Solution
Reconstruction Drawing of Durrington Walls
Harmonic Series Solution
What is the concentration of HNO3 in the final solution when 70.0 mL of a 6.00 M HNO3 solution ...
A solution of CsF in water has XCsF = 0.0700. What is the molality?
Find the solution set of each of the following equations and inequalities.