If Company A runs an aggressive advertising campaign that tells customers why they should quit doing business with Company B and do business with A instead, B will be able to sue A for interference with a prospective advantage.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Question 2
Andrea offered to buy apricots from Aramos. The offer was for 10 tons at 1.20 per pound to be transported to Andrea's warehouse in Aramos trucks. Aramos accepted the offer, but said that the goods would be transported in Andrea's trucks. A dispute later arose and Aramos refused to sell the apricots, asserting that no contract existed. If Aramos sues, it:
a. wins because agricultural products are outside the scope of the UCC
b. wins because his acceptance changed terms from the original offer by Andrea
c. loses because Aramos never got specific permission to change the terms of the initial offer
d. loses if it can be shown that Aramos did not offer new consideration for the transportation modifications to the contract
e. none of the other choices
Aggressive and disruptive children are often not well-liked by peers and can be rejected or excluded ...
Polio eradication campaign in Georgia in the 1950s. In the 1950s, 20,000 cases of polio occurred ...
Ads from the public service campaign in the late 1960s and early 1970s that encouraged people to get ...
This headache remedy was “guaranteed” by the drug company; 1906.
A company purchased 26 desks for $240 each and 18 chairs for $59 each. Compute the total ...
Jia's Fashions recently paid a $2 annual dividend. The company is projecting that its ...