This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: A researcher reports r = .60, p =.02 when correlating the relationship between anxiety level and ... (Read 25 times)

neverstopbelieb

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
A researcher reports r = .60, p =.02 when correlating the relationship between anxiety level and pulse rate in a study with an alpha of .05. How should the nurse who is reading this report interpret these results?
 
  1. As anxiety increased, so did pulse rates in this study; this was a statistically significant although moderate, positive correlation.
  2. As anxiety increased, so did pulse rates in this study and this correlation was both negative and strong.
  3. As anxiety increased, so did pulse rates in this study and this correlation was a strong, positive correlation that failed to reach significance.
  4. Anxiety and pulse rates increased but the correlation was weak.

Question 2

Quantitative researchers are more likely than qualitative researchers to pursue research with prediction and control as a purpose.
 
  A) True
  B) False



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

chreslie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 307
Answer to Question 1

1
Rationale 1: You are correct in concluding that r = .60 is a positive correlation; if the variable of anxiety increased, there was also likely to be a rise in pulse in many cases. An r of .60 is considered to be a moderate correlation and a p value of .02 is less than the preset of .05, so the difference is statistically significant.
Rationale 2: A negative correlation means that one variable increased and the other decreased. This is usually denoted by a negative (-) sign in front of the value reported.
Rationale 3: An r = .60 is positive, meaning if one variable increased the other was also likely to increase. This value also indicates a moderate correlation; so although it did not happen in all cases, the tendency for both to increase together would still be visible if you were to plot the relationship out on a scatter plot. The p value is less than , so the difference did reach significance.
Rationale 4: Correlations of .30 or less are usually considered weak, although one should remember that you can have a weak yet statistically significant correlation; the two factors are not mutually exclusive.

Answer to Question 2

A





 

Did you know?

The first-known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used in Egypt in 2000 BC. Condoms were also reportedly used, made of animal bladders or intestines.

Did you know?

Certain rare plants containing cyanide include apricot pits and a type of potato called cassava. Fortunately, only chronic or massive ingestion of any of these plants can lead to serious poisoning.

Did you know?

The effects of organophosphate poisoning are referred to by using the abbreviations “SLUD” or “SLUDGE,” It stands for: salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, GI upset, and emesis.

Did you know?

Malaria mortality rates are falling. Increased malaria prevention and control measures have greatly improved these rates. Since 2000, malaria mortality rates have fallen globally by 60% among all age groups, and by 65% among children under age 5.

Did you know?

It is believed that the Incas used anesthesia. Evidence supports the theory that shamans chewed cocoa leaves and drilled holes into the heads of patients (letting evil spirits escape), spitting into the wounds they made. The mixture of cocaine, saliva, and resin numbed the site enough to allow hours of drilling.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library