This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Palko v. Connecticut (1937 ) the Supreme Court broadly ruled that certain provisions of the ... (Read 75 times)

Alainaaa8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937 ) the Supreme Court broadly ruled that certain provisions of the national Bill of Rights apply to the states because of
 
  A) the notion of a reasonable person.
  B) the shock-the-conscience test.
  C) a rational basis standard.
  D) the due process and equal protection clauses.
  E) the notions of ordered liberty and fundamental rights.

Question 2

In this Supreme Court decision, the Court held that the federal guarantees of free speech and free press also applied to the states.
 
  A) Marbury
  B) Barron
  C) Gitlow
  D) McDonald
  E) Heller



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ttt030911

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Answer to Question 1

E

Answer to Question 2

C





 

Did you know?

By definition, when a medication is administered intravenously, its bioavailability is 100%.

Did you know?

Egg cells are about the size of a grain of sand. They are formed inside of a female's ovaries before she is even born.

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

Did you know?

More than 2,500 barbiturates have been synthesized. At the height of their popularity, about 50 were marketed for human use.

Did you know?

More than nineteen million Americans carry the factor V gene that causes blood clots, pulmonary embolism, and heart disease.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library