This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Palko v. Connecticut (1937 ) the Supreme Court broadly ruled that certain provisions of the ... (Read 72 times)

Alainaaa8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937 ) the Supreme Court broadly ruled that certain provisions of the national Bill of Rights apply to the states because of
 
  A) the notion of a reasonable person.
  B) the shock-the-conscience test.
  C) a rational basis standard.
  D) the due process and equal protection clauses.
  E) the notions of ordered liberty and fundamental rights.

Question 2

In this Supreme Court decision, the Court held that the federal guarantees of free speech and free press also applied to the states.
 
  A) Marbury
  B) Barron
  C) Gitlow
  D) McDonald
  E) Heller



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ttt030911

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Answer to Question 1

E

Answer to Question 2

C





 

Did you know?

For about 100 years, scientists thought that peptic ulcers were caused by stress, spicy food, and alcohol. Later, researchers added stomach acid to the list of causes and began treating ulcers with antacids. Now it is known that peptic ulcers are predominantly caused by Helicobacter pylori, a spiral-shaped bacterium that normally exist in the stomach.

Did you know?

In 2006, a generic antinausea drug named ondansetron was approved. It is used to stop nausea and vomiting associated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy.

Did you know?

The word drug comes from the Dutch word droog (meaning "dry"). For centuries, most drugs came from dried plants, hence the name.

Did you know?

About 100 new prescription or over-the-counter drugs come into the U.S. market every year.

Did you know?

The FDA recognizes 118 routes of administration.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library