This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Palko v. Connecticut (1937 ) the Supreme Court broadly ruled that certain provisions of the ... (Read 90 times)

Alainaaa8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937 ) the Supreme Court broadly ruled that certain provisions of the national Bill of Rights apply to the states because of
 
  A) the notion of a reasonable person.
  B) the shock-the-conscience test.
  C) a rational basis standard.
  D) the due process and equal protection clauses.
  E) the notions of ordered liberty and fundamental rights.

Question 2

In this Supreme Court decision, the Court held that the federal guarantees of free speech and free press also applied to the states.
 
  A) Marbury
  B) Barron
  C) Gitlow
  D) McDonald
  E) Heller



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ttt030911

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Answer to Question 1

E

Answer to Question 2

C





 

Did you know?

Increased intake of vitamin D has been shown to reduce fractures up to 25% in older people.

Did you know?

This year, an estimated 1.4 million Americans will have a new or recurrent heart attack.

Did you know?

Everyone has one nostril that is larger than the other.

Did you know?

Vampire bats have a natural anticoagulant in their saliva that permits continuous bleeding after they painlessly open a wound with their incisors. This capillary blood does not cause any significant blood loss to their victims.

Did you know?

People often find it difficult to accept the idea that bacteria can be beneficial and improve health. Lactic acid bacteria are good, and when eaten, these bacteria improve health and increase longevity. These bacteria included in foods such as yogurt.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library