This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Palko v. Connecticut (1937 ) the Supreme Court broadly ruled that certain provisions of the ... (Read 42 times)

Alainaaa8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937 ) the Supreme Court broadly ruled that certain provisions of the national Bill of Rights apply to the states because of
 
  A) the notion of a reasonable person.
  B) the shock-the-conscience test.
  C) a rational basis standard.
  D) the due process and equal protection clauses.
  E) the notions of ordered liberty and fundamental rights.

Question 2

In this Supreme Court decision, the Court held that the federal guarantees of free speech and free press also applied to the states.
 
  A) Marbury
  B) Barron
  C) Gitlow
  D) McDonald
  E) Heller



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ttt030911

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Answer to Question 1

E

Answer to Question 2

C





 

Did you know?

All patients with hyperparathyroidism will develop osteoporosis. The parathyroid glands maintain blood calcium within the normal range. All patients with this disease will continue to lose calcium from their bones every day, and there is no way to prevent the development of osteoporosis as a result.

Did you know?

In most cases, kidneys can recover from almost complete loss of function, such as in acute kidney (renal) failure.

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

Critical care patients are twice as likely to receive the wrong medication. Of these errors, 20% are life-threatening, and 42% require additional life-sustaining treatments.

Did you know?

The immune system needs 9.5 hours of sleep in total darkness to recharge completely.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library