This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Palko v. Connecticut (1937 ) the Supreme Court broadly ruled that certain provisions of the ... (Read 79 times)

Alainaaa8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937 ) the Supreme Court broadly ruled that certain provisions of the national Bill of Rights apply to the states because of
 
  A) the notion of a reasonable person.
  B) the shock-the-conscience test.
  C) a rational basis standard.
  D) the due process and equal protection clauses.
  E) the notions of ordered liberty and fundamental rights.

Question 2

In this Supreme Court decision, the Court held that the federal guarantees of free speech and free press also applied to the states.
 
  A) Marbury
  B) Barron
  C) Gitlow
  D) McDonald
  E) Heller



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ttt030911

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Answer to Question 1

E

Answer to Question 2

C





 

Did you know?

Today, nearly 8 out of 10 pregnant women living with HIV (about 1.1 million), receive antiretrovirals.

Did you know?

According to research, pregnant women tend to eat more if carrying a baby boy. Male fetuses may secrete a chemical that stimulates their mothers to step up her energy intake.

Did you know?

Blood in the urine can be a sign of a kidney stone, glomerulonephritis, or other kidney problems.

Did you know?

Carbamazepine can interfere with the results of home pregnancy tests. If you are taking carbamazepine, do not try to test for pregnancy at home.

Did you know?

As the western states of America were settled, pioneers often had to drink rancid water from ponds and other sources. This often resulted in chronic diarrhea, causing many cases of dehydration and death that could have been avoided if clean water had been available.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library