Author Question: Lipari V. Sears, Roebuck & Co was a federal case that further extended the duty of counselors to ... (Read 75 times)

mpobi80

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 519
Lipari V. Sears, Roebuck & Co was a federal case that further extended the duty of counselors to _______________.
 
  (a) Warn victims
   (b) Protect unknown victims
   (c) Protect identifiable victims
   (d) All of the above

Question 2

According to Gorski, which clients are appropriate for Cenaps Model relapse prevention?
 
  (a) any client who has been in recovery for at least 90 days and sincerely wants to stay clean and sober (b) clients who have completed Minnesota Model treatment programs (c) clients who regularly attend AA (d) clients who have completed the primary goals of treatment



Christopher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

(d)



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

The first successful kidney transplant was performed in 1954 and occurred in Boston. A kidney from an identical twin was transplanted into his dying brother's body and was not rejected because it did not appear foreign to his body.

Did you know?

Since 1988, the CDC has reported a 99% reduction in bacterial meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae, due to the introduction of the vaccine against it.

Did you know?

When blood is exposed to air, it clots. Heparin allows the blood to come in direct contact with air without clotting.

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library