Author Question: Lipari V. Sears, Roebuck & Co was a federal case that further extended the duty of counselors to ... (Read 82 times)

mpobi80

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 519
Lipari V. Sears, Roebuck & Co was a federal case that further extended the duty of counselors to _______________.
 
  (a) Warn victims
   (b) Protect unknown victims
   (c) Protect identifiable victims
   (d) All of the above

Question 2

According to Gorski, which clients are appropriate for Cenaps Model relapse prevention?
 
  (a) any client who has been in recovery for at least 90 days and sincerely wants to stay clean and sober (b) clients who have completed Minnesota Model treatment programs (c) clients who regularly attend AA (d) clients who have completed the primary goals of treatment



Christopher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

(d)



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

Did you know?

Today, nearly 8 out of 10 pregnant women living with HIV (about 1.1 million), receive antiretrovirals.

Did you know?

Blood in the urine can be a sign of a kidney stone, glomerulonephritis, or other kidney problems.

Did you know?

According to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, lung disease is the third leading killer in the United States, responsible for one in seven deaths. It is the leading cause of death among infants under the age of one year.

Did you know?

The effects of organophosphate poisoning are referred to by using the abbreviations “SLUD” or “SLUDGE,” It stands for: salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, GI upset, and emesis.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library