Author Question: Lipari V. Sears, Roebuck & Co was a federal case that further extended the duty of counselors to ... (Read 72 times)

mpobi80

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 519
Lipari V. Sears, Roebuck & Co was a federal case that further extended the duty of counselors to _______________.
 
  (a) Warn victims
   (b) Protect unknown victims
   (c) Protect identifiable victims
   (d) All of the above

Question 2

According to Gorski, which clients are appropriate for Cenaps Model relapse prevention?
 
  (a) any client who has been in recovery for at least 90 days and sincerely wants to stay clean and sober (b) clients who have completed Minnesota Model treatment programs (c) clients who regularly attend AA (d) clients who have completed the primary goals of treatment



Christopher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

(d)



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

The Babylonians wrote numbers in a system that used 60 as the base value rather than the number 10. They did not have a symbol for "zero."

Did you know?

Adult head lice are gray, about ? inch long, and often have a tiny dot on their backs. A female can lay between 50 and 150 eggs within the several weeks that she is alive. They feed on human blood.

Did you know?

There are over 65,000 known species of protozoa. About 10,000 species are parasitic.

Did you know?

Alzheimer's disease affects only about 10% of people older than 65 years of age. Most forms of decreased mental function and dementia are caused by disuse (letting the mind get lazy).

Did you know?

Increased intake of vitamin D has been shown to reduce fractures up to 25% in older people.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library