Lipari V. Sears, Roebuck & Co was a federal case that further ...

[mpobi80]

Lipari V. Sears, Roebuck & Co was a federal case that further extended the duty of counselors to _______________.
 
  (a) Warn victims
   (b) Protect unknown victims
   (c) Protect identifiable victims
   (d) All of the above

Question 2

According to Gorski, which clients are appropriate for Cenaps Model relapse prevention?
 
  (a) any client who has been in recovery for at least 90 days and sincerely wants to stay clean and sober (b) clients who have completed Minnesota Model treatment programs (c) clients who regularly attend AA (d) clients who have completed the primary goals of treatment

[Christopher]

Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

(d)

[mpobi80]

TY

[Christopher]

You're welcome