Author Question: Lipari V. Sears, Roebuck & Co was a federal case that further extended the duty of counselors to ... (Read 62 times)

mpobi80

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 519
Lipari V. Sears, Roebuck & Co was a federal case that further extended the duty of counselors to _______________.
 
  (a) Warn victims
   (b) Protect unknown victims
   (c) Protect identifiable victims
   (d) All of the above

Question 2

According to Gorski, which clients are appropriate for Cenaps Model relapse prevention?
 
  (a) any client who has been in recovery for at least 90 days and sincerely wants to stay clean and sober (b) clients who have completed Minnesota Model treatment programs (c) clients who regularly attend AA (d) clients who have completed the primary goals of treatment



Christopher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

(d)



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Cucumber slices relieve headaches by tightening blood vessels, reducing blood flow to the area, and relieving pressure.

Did you know?

During the twentieth century, a variant of the metric system was used in Russia and France in which the base unit of mass was the tonne. Instead of kilograms, this system used millitonnes (mt).

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

Cancer has been around as long as humankind, but only in the second half of the twentieth century did the number of cancer cases explode.

Did you know?

Since 1988, the CDC has reported a 99% reduction in bacterial meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae, due to the introduction of the vaccine against it.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library