If Company A runs an aggressive advertising campaign that tells customers why they should quit doing business with Company B and do business with A instead, B will be able to sue A for interference with a prospective advantage.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Question 2
Andrea offered to buy apricots from Aramos. The offer was for 10 tons at 1.20 per pound to be transported to Andrea's warehouse in Aramos trucks. Aramos accepted the offer, but said that the goods would be transported in Andrea's trucks. A dispute later arose and Aramos refused to sell the apricots, asserting that no contract existed. If Aramos sues, it:
a. wins because agricultural products are outside the scope of the UCC
b. wins because his acceptance changed terms from the original offer by Andrea
c. loses because Aramos never got specific permission to change the terms of the initial offer
d. loses if it can be shown that Aramos did not offer new consideration for the transportation modifications to the contract
e. none of the other choices
Campaign in the South, 1779–1781
Your nose runs like a leaky faucet and turns beet red from constant wiping
Alcohol and Advertising Advertising for alcoholic beverages is pervasive and persuasive
A company spends $117 500 today and has positive cash inflows of $34 000 for each of the next 6 ...
An organizational specialist is hired as a consultant to a company planning to open a coffee ...
A company that makes cell phones has the following cost structure. They have fixed costs of ...