This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Wanting to enjoy the beautiful weather, Cassie took a walk with no destination in mind. At each ... (Read 77 times)

Chelseaamend

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 545
Wanting to enjoy the beautiful weather, Cassie took a walk with no destination in mind. At each four-way intersection, she randomly decided to head either south or west.
 
  A summary of her walk is shown below.
   S S S S S W W S W S
   S S S S S S W W W S
   S W W S W S W S W S
   W W W S S W W W S W
  Is there evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to support the hypothesis that Cassie's walk was not
  random?
  A) z = -0.26
  Since z < z0.025 = 1.96, we do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis
  that her walk was not random.
  B) z = -0.91
  Since z < z0.025 = 1.96, we do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis
  that her walk was not random.
  C) z = -5.43
  Since z > z0.025 = 1.96, we reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that her
  walk was not random.
  D) z = -3.50
  Since z > z0.025 = 1.96, we reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that her
  walk was not random.

Question 2

The two flavors of ice cream in a taste test are supposed to be administered to respondents in a random fashion.
 
  Suspecting that the administrators of the test did not follow the randomness rule, the project statistician examines the flavor order for the day's taste testing, shown below. vanilla chocolate vanilla chocolate chocolate chocolate vanilla chocolate vanilla vanilla chocolate vanilla chocolate vanilla chocolate vanilla chocolate vanilla chocolate vanilla Is there evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to support the hypothesis that the flavor order is not random? A) r = 17; lower critical value = 6; upper critical value = 16
  Since r = 16, we reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that the sequence is not
  random.
  B) r = 16; lower critical value = 7; upper critical value = 18
  Since 7 < r < 18, we do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that the
  sequence is not random.
  C) r = 18; lower critical value = 7; upper critical value = 18
  Since r = 18, we reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that the sequence is not
  random.
  D) r = 15; lower critical value = 6; upper critical value = 16
  Since 7 < r < 18, we do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that the
  sequence is not random.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

joneynes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 376
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

A




Chelseaamend

  • Member
  • Posts: 545
Reply 2 on: Jul 24, 2018
Gracias!


xthemafja

  • Member
  • Posts: 348
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

HIV testing reach is still limited. An estimated 40% of people with HIV (more than 14 million) remain undiagnosed and do not know their infection status.

Did you know?

Patients who have been on total parenteral nutrition for more than a few days may need to have foods gradually reintroduced to give the digestive tract time to start working again.

Did you know?

On average, the stomach produces 2 L of hydrochloric acid per day.

Did you know?

The most common childhood diseases include croup, chickenpox, ear infections, flu, pneumonia, ringworm, respiratory syncytial virus, scabies, head lice, and asthma.

Did you know?

Earwax has antimicrobial properties that reduce the viability of bacteria and fungus in the human ear.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library