This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Wanting to enjoy the beautiful weather, Cassie took a walk with no destination in mind. At each ... (Read 92 times)

Chelseaamend

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 545
Wanting to enjoy the beautiful weather, Cassie took a walk with no destination in mind. At each four-way intersection, she randomly decided to head either south or west.
 
  A summary of her walk is shown below.
   S S S S S W W S W S
   S S S S S S W W W S
   S W W S W S W S W S
   W W W S S W W W S W
  Is there evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to support the hypothesis that Cassie's walk was not
  random?
  A) z = -0.26
  Since z < z0.025 = 1.96, we do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis
  that her walk was not random.
  B) z = -0.91
  Since z < z0.025 = 1.96, we do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis
  that her walk was not random.
  C) z = -5.43
  Since z > z0.025 = 1.96, we reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that her
  walk was not random.
  D) z = -3.50
  Since z > z0.025 = 1.96, we reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that her
  walk was not random.

Question 2

The two flavors of ice cream in a taste test are supposed to be administered to respondents in a random fashion.
 
  Suspecting that the administrators of the test did not follow the randomness rule, the project statistician examines the flavor order for the day's taste testing, shown below. vanilla chocolate vanilla chocolate chocolate chocolate vanilla chocolate vanilla vanilla chocolate vanilla chocolate vanilla chocolate vanilla chocolate vanilla chocolate vanilla Is there evidence at the a = 0.05 level of significance to support the hypothesis that the flavor order is not random? A) r = 17; lower critical value = 6; upper critical value = 16
  Since r = 16, we reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that the sequence is not
  random.
  B) r = 16; lower critical value = 7; upper critical value = 18
  Since 7 < r < 18, we do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that the
  sequence is not random.
  C) r = 18; lower critical value = 7; upper critical value = 18
  Since r = 18, we reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that the sequence is not
  random.
  D) r = 15; lower critical value = 6; upper critical value = 16
  Since 7 < r < 18, we do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that the
  sequence is not random.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

joneynes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 376
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

A




Chelseaamend

  • Member
  • Posts: 545
Reply 2 on: Jul 24, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


komodo7

  • Member
  • Posts: 322
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

Did you know?

About 3% of all pregnant women will give birth to twins, which is an increase in rate of nearly 60% since the early 1980s.

Did you know?

Eating food that has been cooked with poppy seeds may cause you to fail a drug screening test, because the seeds contain enough opiate alkaloids to register as a positive.

Did you know?

More than one-third of adult Americans are obese. Diseases that kill the largest number of people annually, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, stroke, and hypertension, can be attributed to diet.

Did you know?

Oxytocin is recommended only for pregnancies that have a medical reason for inducing labor (such as eclampsia) and is not recommended for elective procedures or for making the birthing process more convenient.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library