Author Question: Which of the following landmark cases led to the stipulation that wrong means legally and morally ... (Read 84 times)

brutforce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
Which of the following landmark cases led to the stipulation that wrong means legally and morally wrong?
 
  a) Regina vs. M'Naghten
  b) Regina vs. Swain
  c) Regina vs. Chaulk
  d) Regina vs. Oommen

Question 2

Which of the following landmark cases lead to the accused being required to know what is wrong, but also being able to apply that knowledge at the time of the act?
 
  a) Regina vs. M'Naghten
  b) Regina vs. Swain
  c) Regina vs. Chaulk
  d) Regina vs. Oommen



polinasid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

This is awesome you took your the time to answer these questions. You have been so helpful.

Answer to Question 2

Great help.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

It is believed that humans initially contracted crabs from gorillas about 3 million years ago from either sleeping in gorilla nests or eating the apes.

Did you know?

More than 2,500 barbiturates have been synthesized. At the height of their popularity, about 50 were marketed for human use.

Did you know?

You should not take more than 1,000 mg of vitamin E per day. Doses above this amount increase the risk of bleeding problems that can lead to a stroke.

Did you know?

Disorders that may affect pharmacodynamics include genetic mutations, malnutrition, thyrotoxicosis, myasthenia gravis, Parkinson's disease, and certain forms of insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus.

Did you know?

People about to have surgery must tell their health care providers about all supplements they take.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library