Author Question: Which of the following landmark cases led to the stipulation that wrong means legally and morally ... (Read 80 times)

brutforce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
Which of the following landmark cases led to the stipulation that wrong means legally and morally wrong?
 
  a) Regina vs. M'Naghten
  b) Regina vs. Swain
  c) Regina vs. Chaulk
  d) Regina vs. Oommen

Question 2

Which of the following landmark cases lead to the accused being required to know what is wrong, but also being able to apply that knowledge at the time of the act?
 
  a) Regina vs. M'Naghten
  b) Regina vs. Swain
  c) Regina vs. Chaulk
  d) Regina vs. Oommen



polinasid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

This is awesome you took your the time to answer these questions. You have been so helpful.

Answer to Question 2

Great help.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Drying your hands with a paper towel will reduce the bacterial count on your hands by 45–60%.

Did you know?

About 3% of all pregnant women will give birth to twins, which is an increase in rate of nearly 60% since the early 1980s.

Did you know?

In 2006, a generic antinausea drug named ondansetron was approved. It is used to stop nausea and vomiting associated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy.

Did you know?

In 2010, opiate painkllers, such as morphine, OxyContin®, and Vicodin®, were tied to almost 60% of drug overdose deaths.

Did you know?

Never take aspirin without food because it is likely to irritate your stomach. Never give aspirin to children under age 12. Overdoses of aspirin have the potential to cause deafness.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library