Author Question: Which of the following landmark cases led to the stipulation that wrong means legally and morally ... (Read 75 times)

brutforce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
Which of the following landmark cases led to the stipulation that wrong means legally and morally wrong?
 
  a) Regina vs. M'Naghten
  b) Regina vs. Swain
  c) Regina vs. Chaulk
  d) Regina vs. Oommen

Question 2

Which of the following landmark cases lead to the accused being required to know what is wrong, but also being able to apply that knowledge at the time of the act?
 
  a) Regina vs. M'Naghten
  b) Regina vs. Swain
  c) Regina vs. Chaulk
  d) Regina vs. Oommen



polinasid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

This is awesome you took your the time to answer these questions. You have been so helpful.

Answer to Question 2

Great help.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Individuals are never “cured” of addictions. Instead, they learn how to manage their disease to lead healthy, balanced lives.

Did you know?

The shortest mature adult human of whom there is independent evidence was Gul Mohammed in India. In 1990, he was measured in New Delhi and stood 22.5 inches tall.

Did you know?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or MRSA was discovered in 1961 in the United Kingdom. It if often referred to as a superbug. MRSA infections cause more deaths in the United States every year than AIDS.

Methicilli ...
Did you know?

For pediatric patients, intravenous fluids are the most commonly cited products involved in medication errors that are reported to the USP.

Did you know?

Certain chemicals, after ingestion, can be converted by the body into cyanide. Most of these chemicals have been removed from the market, but some old nail polish remover, solvents, and plastics manufacturing solutions can contain these substances.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library