Author Question: Which of the following landmark cases led to the stipulation that wrong means legally and morally ... (Read 99 times)

brutforce

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 540
Which of the following landmark cases led to the stipulation that wrong means legally and morally wrong?
 
  a) Regina vs. M'Naghten
  b) Regina vs. Swain
  c) Regina vs. Chaulk
  d) Regina vs. Oommen

Question 2

Which of the following landmark cases lead to the accused being required to know what is wrong, but also being able to apply that knowledge at the time of the act?
 
  a) Regina vs. M'Naghten
  b) Regina vs. Swain
  c) Regina vs. Chaulk
  d) Regina vs. Oommen



polinasid

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

This is awesome you took your the time to answer these questions. You have been so helpful.

Answer to Question 2

Great help.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Eating carrots will improve your eyesight. Carrots are high in vitamin A (retinol), which is essential for good vision. It can also be found in milk, cheese, egg yolks, and liver.

Did you know?

Ether was used widely for surgeries but became less popular because of its flammability and its tendency to cause vomiting. In England, it was quickly replaced by chloroform, but this agent caused many deaths and lost popularity.

Did you know?

The B-complex vitamins and vitamin C are not stored in the body and must be replaced each day.

Did you know?

Hip fractures are the most serious consequences of osteoporosis. The incidence of hip fractures increases with each decade among patients in their 60s to patients in their 90s for both women and men of all populations. Men and women older than 80 years of age show the highest incidence of hip fractures.

Did you know?

Individuals are never “cured” of addictions. Instead, they learn how to manage their disease to lead healthy, balanced lives.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library