Compared with that of preadolescents, adolescents' thinking about science is more likely to
be logically inconsistent.
recognize alternative possibilities.
be concretely tied to the situation.
maintain traditional ideas.
Question 2
A professor asks a group of 8-year-olds and a group of 16-year-olds to argue that they should receive a reduction in their allowance, an argument with which they all surely disagree. Which of the following statements is a likely result of this study?
Almost none of the students will be able to do this.
Eight-year-olds will be able to do this, but 16-year-olds will be unable to do
this.
Sixteen-year-olds will be able to do this, but 8-year-olds will be unable to do
this.
Almost all of the students will be able to do this easily.
Species-rich floras of chalk grassland compared to species-poor floras of acid soils.
Critical thinking model for safety planning
Primates in the New World tend to be small-bodied compared to those elsewhere.
Mahatma Gandhi and Corrie ten Boom exemplified Kohlberg’s stage 6 moral thinking. They devoted ...
Clinical Embryology Training:Promising career for Life science Graduates
Tips for Critical Thinking