Compared with that of preadolescents, adolescents' thinking about science is more likely to
be logically inconsistent.
recognize alternative possibilities.
be concretely tied to the situation.
maintain traditional ideas.
Question 2
A professor asks a group of 8-year-olds and a group of 16-year-olds to argue that they should receive a reduction in their allowance, an argument with which they all surely disagree. Which of the following statements is a likely result of this study?
Almost none of the students will be able to do this.
Eight-year-olds will be able to do this, but 16-year-olds will be unable to do
this.
Sixteen-year-olds will be able to do this, but 8-year-olds will be unable to do
this.
Almost all of the students will be able to do this easily.
Critical thinking model for safety evaluation
Compared to a chimpanzee, the human newborn has relatively little room to spare as it passes through
Measuring the resistance of the ECT sensor. The resistance measurement can then be compared with ...
Liquid Water Properties compared with n-pentane, nonpolar, non-hydrogen bonding liquid
Introduction to Management Science, 13th Edition
Tips for Critical Thinking