In Guz v. Bechtel National the supreme court of California held that Guz, an employee who had been fired and sued for wrongful dismissal had:
a. no cause of action because his performance had been poor
b. no cause of action for breach of implied contract; his best hope was a violation of personnel policies that constituted a contract
c. no cause of action for violation of personnel policies, because the company followed proper procedure, but may have a cause of action for breach of implied contract
d. a cause of action for breach of an implied covenant of fair dealing e. a cause of action for breach of California's employment code
Question 2
To be enforceable against the mortgagor, a mortgage must meet all the following requirements except:
a. Be delivered to the mortgagee.
b. Be in writing and signed by the mortgagor.
c. Be recorded by the mortgagee.
d. Include a description of the debt and land involved.
A thermal pool in Yellowstone National Park.
In the figure, a 10.0-m long bar is attached by a frictionless hinge to a wall and held ...
National Patient Safety Goals for Acute-Care Hospitals
Composition of the supreme court, as of November 2020