This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: In Mazetti v. Armour, a court in 1913 held that a food producer must provide food safe for human ... (Read 75 times)

clmills979

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
In Mazetti v. Armour, a court in 1913 held that a food producer must provide food safe for human consumption, even if there is no privity of contract. Liability was based on:
 a. misrepresentation b. caveat emptor
  c. UCC Section 2-314
  d. implied warranty of safety e. express warranty of safety

Question 2

A transfer of contract rights to a third party is a delegation.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Harbringer

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

FALSE




clmills979

  • Member
  • Posts: 551
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Gracias!


bdobbins

  • Member
  • Posts: 326
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

Blood in the urine can be a sign of a kidney stone, glomerulonephritis, or other kidney problems.

Did you know?

The average adult has about 21 square feet of skin.

Did you know?

Anti-aging claims should not ever be believed. There is no supplement, medication, or any other substance that has been proven to slow or stop the aging process.

Did you know?

Most women experience menopause in their 50s. However, in 1994, an Italian woman gave birth to a baby boy when she was 61 years old.

Did you know?

Vampire bats have a natural anticoagulant in their saliva that permits continuous bleeding after they painlessly open a wound with their incisors. This capillary blood does not cause any significant blood loss to their victims.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library