This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following would be considered level 1 research evidence when evaluating evidence for ... (Read 32 times)

magmichele12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 559
Which of the following would be considered level 1 research evidence when evaluating evidence for the establishment of IV site care and maintenance for a medical-surgical unit?
 
  a. Case study review of dressings used at a similar-sized hospital
  b. Expert opinion of best dressings used in hospital settings
  c. Quasi-experimental study evaluating types of dressings used at selected hospitals
  d. Randomized clinical trial study conducted on types of dressings used in hospital settings

Question 2

The main purpose of leveling or reviewing research evidence in the establishment of evidence-based guidelines is to:
 
  a. critique the usefulness of the research in expanding knowledge.
  b. develop guidelines for providing care to clients.
  c. generate new nursing research projects.
  d. review research methods for appropriateness within a research report.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

patma1981

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 292
Answer to Question 1

ANS: D
Randomized clinical trials (RCT) provide the strongest evidence for establishing evidence-based practice guidelines because of the strength of the research process.
Case studies provide neither the same rigor in the process nor generalizable results.
Expert opinion provides the lowest level of strength because it is not a conducted study.
Quasi-experimental studies often lack randomization and have limited generalizability of results.

Answer to Question 2

ANS: B
The main purpose of leveling research evidence in the establishment of evidence-based practice guidelines is to develop standard guidelines for providing care to clients that are based on the strongest evidence known, to improve the quality of care.
The purpose of a critique of a research article is to establish usefulness in one's particular practice.
This would be a potential offshoot of research evidence review; it is not the main purpose.
The purpose of a peer review before publication is to see that the establishment of the stated purpose or aim of the research was achieved.




magmichele12

  • Member
  • Posts: 559
Reply 2 on: Jul 8, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


softEldritch

  • Member
  • Posts: 334
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

Approximately 15–25% of recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage. However, many miscarriages often occur before a woman even knows she is pregnant.

Did you know?

Though Candida and Aspergillus species are the most common fungal pathogens causing invasive fungal disease in the immunocompromised, infections due to previously uncommon hyaline and dematiaceous filamentous fungi are occurring more often today. Rare fungal infections, once accurately diagnosed, may require surgical debridement, immunotherapy, and newer antifungals used singly or in combination with older antifungals, on a case-by-case basis.

Did you know?

To prove that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and not by stress, a researcher consumed an entire laboratory beaker full of bacterial culture. After this, he did indeed develop stomach ulcers, and won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.

Did you know?

The Romans did not use numerals to indicate fractions but instead used words to indicate parts of a whole.

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library