This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following would be considered level 1 research evidence when evaluating evidence for ... (Read 69 times)

magmichele12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 559
Which of the following would be considered level 1 research evidence when evaluating evidence for the establishment of IV site care and maintenance for a medical-surgical unit?
 
  a. Case study review of dressings used at a similar-sized hospital
  b. Expert opinion of best dressings used in hospital settings
  c. Quasi-experimental study evaluating types of dressings used at selected hospitals
  d. Randomized clinical trial study conducted on types of dressings used in hospital settings

Question 2

The main purpose of leveling or reviewing research evidence in the establishment of evidence-based guidelines is to:
 
  a. critique the usefulness of the research in expanding knowledge.
  b. develop guidelines for providing care to clients.
  c. generate new nursing research projects.
  d. review research methods for appropriateness within a research report.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

patma1981

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 292
Answer to Question 1

ANS: D
Randomized clinical trials (RCT) provide the strongest evidence for establishing evidence-based practice guidelines because of the strength of the research process.
Case studies provide neither the same rigor in the process nor generalizable results.
Expert opinion provides the lowest level of strength because it is not a conducted study.
Quasi-experimental studies often lack randomization and have limited generalizability of results.

Answer to Question 2

ANS: B
The main purpose of leveling research evidence in the establishment of evidence-based practice guidelines is to develop standard guidelines for providing care to clients that are based on the strongest evidence known, to improve the quality of care.
The purpose of a critique of a research article is to establish usefulness in one's particular practice.
This would be a potential offshoot of research evidence review; it is not the main purpose.
The purpose of a peer review before publication is to see that the establishment of the stated purpose or aim of the research was achieved.




magmichele12

  • Member
  • Posts: 559
Reply 2 on: Jul 8, 2018
Excellent


CAPTAINAMERICA

  • Member
  • Posts: 325
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

Urine turns bright yellow if larger than normal amounts of certain substances are consumed; one of these substances is asparagus.

Did you know?

HIV testing reach is still limited. An estimated 40% of people with HIV (more than 14 million) remain undiagnosed and do not know their infection status.

Did you know?

The first monoclonal antibodies were made exclusively from mouse cells. Some are now fully human, which means they are likely to be safer and may be more effective than older monoclonal antibodies.

Did you know?

As the western states of America were settled, pioneers often had to drink rancid water from ponds and other sources. This often resulted in chronic diarrhea, causing many cases of dehydration and death that could have been avoided if clean water had been available.

Did you know?

If all the neurons in the human body were lined up, they would stretch more than 600 miles.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library