This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following would be considered level 1 research evidence when evaluating evidence for ... (Read 43 times)

magmichele12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 559
Which of the following would be considered level 1 research evidence when evaluating evidence for the establishment of IV site care and maintenance for a medical-surgical unit?
 
  a. Case study review of dressings used at a similar-sized hospital
  b. Expert opinion of best dressings used in hospital settings
  c. Quasi-experimental study evaluating types of dressings used at selected hospitals
  d. Randomized clinical trial study conducted on types of dressings used in hospital settings

Question 2

The main purpose of leveling or reviewing research evidence in the establishment of evidence-based guidelines is to:
 
  a. critique the usefulness of the research in expanding knowledge.
  b. develop guidelines for providing care to clients.
  c. generate new nursing research projects.
  d. review research methods for appropriateness within a research report.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

patma1981

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 292
Answer to Question 1

ANS: D
Randomized clinical trials (RCT) provide the strongest evidence for establishing evidence-based practice guidelines because of the strength of the research process.
Case studies provide neither the same rigor in the process nor generalizable results.
Expert opinion provides the lowest level of strength because it is not a conducted study.
Quasi-experimental studies often lack randomization and have limited generalizability of results.

Answer to Question 2

ANS: B
The main purpose of leveling research evidence in the establishment of evidence-based practice guidelines is to develop standard guidelines for providing care to clients that are based on the strongest evidence known, to improve the quality of care.
The purpose of a critique of a research article is to establish usefulness in one's particular practice.
This would be a potential offshoot of research evidence review; it is not the main purpose.
The purpose of a peer review before publication is to see that the establishment of the stated purpose or aim of the research was achieved.




magmichele12

  • Member
  • Posts: 559
Reply 2 on: Jul 8, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


mammy1697

  • Member
  • Posts: 341
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

Did you know?

To prove that stomach ulcers were caused by bacteria and not by stress, a researcher consumed an entire laboratory beaker full of bacterial culture. After this, he did indeed develop stomach ulcers, and won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.

Did you know?

Most strokes are caused when blood clots move to a blood vessel in the brain and block blood flow to that area. Thrombolytic therapy can be used to dissolve the clot quickly. If given within 3 hours of the first stroke symptoms, this therapy can help limit stroke damage and disability.

Did you know?

Nitroglycerin is used to alleviate various heart-related conditions, and it is also the chief component of dynamite (but mixed in a solid clay base to stabilize it).

Did you know?

In 2006, a generic antinausea drug named ondansetron was approved. It is used to stop nausea and vomiting associated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library