This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Damage to the nasal mucosa during enteral feeding is associated with: 1. Secure feeding tube ... (Read 66 times)

JGIBBSON

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
Damage to the nasal mucosa during enteral feeding is associated with:
 
  1. Secure feeding tube placement.
  2. Use of large-bore feeding tubes.
  3. Flushing the feeding tube before and after medication administration.
  4. Alternating nares for feeding tube placement.

Question 2

The nurse is caring for a client with chronic pancreatitis. Which enteral formulas would be most appropriate for this client?
 
  Standard Text: Select all that apply.
  1. Precision HN
  2. Criticare HN
  3. Vivonex T.E.N.
  4. Peptamen
  5. Vital HN



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

frogdreck123456

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 329
Answer to Question 1

Correct Answer: 2
Rationale 1: Securing a nasal feeding tube in the center position of the nare minimizes friction and decreases damage to the nasal mucosa.
Rationale 2: Extended use of large-bore nasal feeding tubes is associated with damage to the nasal mucosa.
Rationale 3: Flushing the feeding tube before and after medication administration prevents clogging of the tube. It is not associated with damage to the nasal mucosa.
Rationale 4: Alternating nares for feeding tube placement reduces damage to the nasal mucosa.
Global Rationale: Extended use of large-bore nasal feeding tubes is associated with damage to the nasal mucosa. Securing a nasal feeding tube in the center position of the nare minimizes friction and decreases damage to the nasal mucosa. Flushing the feeding tube before and after medication administration prevents clogging of the tube. It is not associated with damage to the nasal mucosa. Alternating nares for feeding tube placement reduces damage to the nasal mucosa.

Answer to Question 2

Correct Answer: 4,5
Rationale 1: Precision HN is an elemental (monomeric) formula and would be appropriate for a client with malabsorption disorder.
Rationale 2: Criticare HN is an elemental (monomeric) formula and would be appropriate for a client with malabsorption disorder.
Rationale 3: Vivonex T.E.N. is an elemental (monomeric) formula and would be appropriate for a client with malabsorption disorder.
Rationale 4: Peptamen is an oligomeric formula and would be appropriate for a client with chronic pancreatitis.
Rationale 5: Vital HN is an oligomeric formula and would be appropriate for a client with chronic pancreatitis.
Global Rationale: Peptamen and Vital HN are oligomeric formulas and would be appropriate for a client with chronic pancreatitis because they cause little stimulation of digestive secretions. The remaining choices are monomeric formulas used for those with malabsorption disorders.




JGIBBSON

  • Member
  • Posts: 538
Reply 2 on: Jul 23, 2018
Excellent


okolip

  • Member
  • Posts: 362
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

More than nineteen million Americans carry the factor V gene that causes blood clots, pulmonary embolism, and heart disease.

Did you know?

Medication errors are three times higher among children and infants than with adults.

Did you know?

A recent study has found that following a diet rich in berries may slow down the aging process of the brain. This diet apparently helps to keep dopamine levels much higher than are seen in normal individuals who do not eat berries as a regular part of their diet as they enter their later years.

Did you know?

The average office desk has 400 times more bacteria on it than a toilet.

Did you know?

The modern decimal position system was the invention of the Hindus (around 800 AD), involving the placing of numerals to indicate their value (units, tens, hundreds, and so on).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library