Discuss the pros and cons of using electroencephalography (EEG) ...

[APUS57]

Discuss the pros and cons of using electroencephalogra phy (EEG) or event-related potentials (ERP).
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Five different neuroimaging methods were presented in the text. Select and compare three of these methods.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

[mohan]

Answer to Question 1

Answer: Pros  high temporal resolution, low invasiveness, and low cost; Cons  disrupted by slight movements, poor spatial resolution

Answer to Question 2

Answer: EEG and ERP have poor spatial resolution but excellent temporal resolution, low invasiveness, and are relatively low cost. MEC have good spatial resolution (for sulci only) and excellent temporal resolution; their invasiveness is low but cost is high. PET has good spatial resolution but poor temporal resolution. PET is highly invasive and costly. MRI and fMRI have excellent spatial resolution and marginal temporal resolution. Invasiveness is low but the cost is high. Optical imaging has poor spatial resolution and marginal temporal resolution. It is moderately invasive but the cost is low.

[APUS57]

Gracias!

[lkanara2]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it