Author Question: How would consequentialist moral theory evaluate the morality of terrorism? a. By reasoning that ... (Read 117 times)

PhilipSeeMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
How would consequentialist moral theory evaluate the morality of terrorism?
 
 

a. By reasoning that all violence is intrinsically wrong.
  b. By asking whether the standards for just war were met.
  c. By asking whether the goals of the terrorist were valuable.
  d. By comparing the desirability of the goals against the costs of the terrorist act.



Question 2

What do most people understand by terrorism?
 
 

a. Any type of violence.
  b. The violence conducted by the military during war.
   c. Random violence against civilians.
  d. Jihadism




Jordin Calloway

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

On average, the stomach produces 2 L of hydrochloric acid per day.

Did you know?

Astigmatism is the most common vision problem. It may accompany nearsightedness or farsightedness. It is usually caused by an irregularly shaped cornea, but sometimes it is the result of an irregularly shaped lens. Either type can be corrected by eyeglasses, contact lenses, or refractive surgery.

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).

Did you know?

The heart is located in the center of the chest, with part of it tipped slightly so that it taps against the left side of the chest.

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library