Author Question: How would consequentialist moral theory evaluate the morality of terrorism? a. By reasoning that ... (Read 118 times)

PhilipSeeMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
How would consequentialist moral theory evaluate the morality of terrorism?
 
 

a. By reasoning that all violence is intrinsically wrong.
  b. By asking whether the standards for just war were met.
  c. By asking whether the goals of the terrorist were valuable.
  d. By comparing the desirability of the goals against the costs of the terrorist act.



Question 2

What do most people understand by terrorism?
 
 

a. Any type of violence.
  b. The violence conducted by the military during war.
   c. Random violence against civilians.
  d. Jihadism




Jordin Calloway

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

It is widely believed that giving a daily oral dose of aspirin to heart attack patients improves their chances of survival because the aspirin blocks the formation of new blood clots.

Did you know?

Long-term mental and physical effects from substance abuse include: paranoia, psychosis, immune deficiencies, and organ damage.

Did you know?

Many of the drugs used by neuroscientists are derived from toxic plants and venomous animals (such as snakes, spiders, snails, and puffer fish).

Did you know?

Hippocrates noted that blood separates into four differently colored liquids when removed from the body and examined: a pure red liquid mixed with white liquid material with a yellow-colored froth at the top and a black substance that settles underneath; he named these the four humors (for blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile).

Did you know?

The oldest recorded age was 122. Madame Jeanne Calment was born in France in 1875 and died in 1997. She was a vegetarian and loved olive oil, port wine, and chocolate.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library