Author Question: How would consequentialist moral theory evaluate the morality of terrorism? a. By reasoning that ... (Read 123 times)

PhilipSeeMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
How would consequentialist moral theory evaluate the morality of terrorism?
 
 

a. By reasoning that all violence is intrinsically wrong.
  b. By asking whether the standards for just war were met.
  c. By asking whether the goals of the terrorist were valuable.
  d. By comparing the desirability of the goals against the costs of the terrorist act.



Question 2

What do most people understand by terrorism?
 
 

a. Any type of violence.
  b. The violence conducted by the military during war.
   c. Random violence against civilians.
  d. Jihadism




Jordin Calloway

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Historic treatments for rheumatoid arthritis have included gold salts, acupuncture, a diet consisting of apples or rhubarb, nutmeg, nettles, bee venom, bracelets made of copper, prayer, rest, tooth extractions, fasting, honey, vitamins, insulin, snow collected on Christmas, magnets, and electric convulsion therapy.

Did you know?

Malaria mortality rates are falling. Increased malaria prevention and control measures have greatly improved these rates. Since 2000, malaria mortality rates have fallen globally by 60% among all age groups, and by 65% among children under age 5.

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

The shortest mature adult human of whom there is independent evidence was Gul Mohammed in India. In 1990, he was measured in New Delhi and stood 22.5 inches tall.

Did you know?

The average adult has about 21 square feet of skin.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library