Author Question: How would consequentialist moral theory evaluate the morality of terrorism? a. By reasoning that ... (Read 132 times)

PhilipSeeMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
How would consequentialist moral theory evaluate the morality of terrorism?
 
 

a. By reasoning that all violence is intrinsically wrong.
  b. By asking whether the standards for just war were met.
  c. By asking whether the goals of the terrorist were valuable.
  d. By comparing the desirability of the goals against the costs of the terrorist act.



Question 2

What do most people understand by terrorism?
 
 

a. Any type of violence.
  b. The violence conducted by the military during war.
   c. Random violence against civilians.
  d. Jihadism




Jordin Calloway

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

The first war in which wide-scale use of anesthetics occurred was the Civil War, and 80% of all wounds were in the extremities.

Did you know?

Illness; diuretics; laxative abuse; hot weather; exercise; sweating; caffeine; alcoholic beverages; starvation diets; inadequate carbohydrate consumption; and diets high in protein, salt, or fiber can cause people to become dehydrated.

Did you know?

Elderly adults are living longer, and causes of death are shifting. At the same time, autopsy rates are at or near their lowest in history.

Did you know?

The strongest synthetic topical retinoid drug available, tazarotene, is used to treat sun-damaged skin, acne, and psoriasis.

Did you know?

Only one in 10 cancer deaths is caused by the primary tumor. The vast majority of cancer mortality is caused by cells breaking away from the main tumor and metastasizing to other parts of the body, such as the brain, bones, or liver.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library