Author Question: How would consequentialist moral theory evaluate the morality of terrorism? a. By reasoning that ... (Read 119 times)

PhilipSeeMore

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
How would consequentialist moral theory evaluate the morality of terrorism?
 
 

a. By reasoning that all violence is intrinsically wrong.
  b. By asking whether the standards for just war were met.
  c. By asking whether the goals of the terrorist were valuable.
  d. By comparing the desirability of the goals against the costs of the terrorist act.



Question 2

What do most people understand by terrorism?
 
 

a. Any type of violence.
  b. The violence conducted by the military during war.
   c. Random violence against civilians.
  d. Jihadism




Jordin Calloway

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

Throughout history, plants containing cardiac steroids have been used as heart drugs and as poisons (e.g., in arrows used in combat), emetics, and diuretics.

Did you know?

Limit intake of red meat and dairy products made with whole milk. Choose skim milk, low-fat or fat-free dairy products. Limit fried food. Use healthy oils when cooking.

Did you know?

The average adult has about 21 square feet of skin.

Did you know?

By definition, when a medication is administered intravenously, its bioavailability is 100%.

Did you know?

The senior population grows every year. Seniors older than 65 years of age now comprise more than 13% of the total population. However, women outlive men. In the 85-and-over age group, there are only 45 men to every 100 women.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library