This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why do jovian planets with highly eccentric orbits indicate that it is unlikely that a star has a ... (Read 54 times)

lilldybug07

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
Why do jovian planets with highly eccentric orbits indicate that it is unlikely that a star has a habitable terrestrial planet?
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Do you think it is possible that a flare star could harbor an advanced civilization? Explain your reasoning.
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ASDFGJLO

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
Answer to Question 1

The large jovian planets with eccentric orbits would destabilize the orbits of terrestrial in the inner solar system, resulting in ejection of the terrestrial planet or conditions too extreme or variable on the terrestrial planet for life to develop.

Answer to Question 2

A flare star has violent flare activity that might disrupt the upper atmosphere of a planet and send energetic particles and X-rays flying through living organismsnot very pleasant.




lilldybug07

  • Member
  • Posts: 546
Reply 2 on: Jul 27, 2018
Gracias!


mjenn52

  • Member
  • Posts: 351
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

Thyroid conditions cause a higher risk of fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome.

Did you know?

Acute bronchitis is an inflammation of the breathing tubes (bronchi), which causes increased mucus production and other changes. It is usually caused by bacteria or viruses, can be serious in people who have pulmonary or cardiac diseases, and can lead to pneumonia.

Did you know?

Medication errors are three times higher among children and infants than with adults.

Did you know?

Multiple sclerosis is a condition wherein the body's nervous system is weakened by an autoimmune reaction that attacks the myelin sheaths of neurons.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library